The Impact of Return on Assets and Current Ratio on Shoe Company Valuation From 2018 To 2022

Authors

  • Ainani Yunda Fitria Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pasundan, Bandung Author
  • Robbi Saepul Rahman Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pasundan, Bandung Author
  • Galih Putra Prawiranegara Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pasundan, Bandung Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55208/aj.v6i1.03

Keywords:

Return on Assets, Current Ratio, Valuation, Quantitative Analysis, Footwear Industry

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze Return on Assets at a certain shoe company, Current Ratio at the same entity, the valuation (PER) of the shoe company, and how Return on Assets and Current Ratio impact this valuation. The research introduces a novel perspective by focusing specifically on this company's financial metrics, an area that has not been widely explored in existing literature. The research adopts a quantitative approach through multiple linear regression analysis. Data collection comes from the Financial Statements and Income Statements of the shoe company. The investigation emphasizes the relationship between Return on Assets, Current Ratio, and valuation. To assess this influence, the study utilizes the coefficient of determination, while employing Ms. Excel and SPSS version 25 for Windows for data analysis. Findings indicate that, according to t-test results, Return on Assets and Current Ratio positively and significantly affect valuation. Furthermore, the f-test confirms that these two metrics collectively have a positive and significant impact on valuation. The coefficient of determination shows that these indicators significantly influence the dependent variable, while the remaining factors relate to other aspects not covered in this research. This study provides practical insights for stakeholders in the footwear industry, shedding light on essential factors that can drive company performance and investment decisions.

References

Agusiady, R., Rahmawati, A., Ratnawati, A., Ismail, M. T., Gustirani, I., & Lestari, H. S. (2024). The The Effect of Current Ratio, Debt To Equity Ratio and Return On Assets on Company Value. International Journal of Islamic Business and Management Review, 4(2), 79-87.

Jonathan, K. L., & Purwaningsih, S. (2023). The Effect of Return on Assets, Debt to Equity Ratio and Current Ratio on Firm Value. Journal of Applied Business, Taxation and Economics Research, 2(3), 266-287.

Khan, N., & Riccio, A. (2024). A systematic review of design for additive manufacturing of aerospace lattice structures: Current trends and future directions. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 149, 101021.

Kovalchuk, T., & Verhun, A. (2019). Improvement of the method of analysis of asset management efficiency. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(5), 61-66.

Renaldo, N., Rozalia, D. K., Musa, S., & Wahid, N. (2023). Current ratio, firm size, and return on equity on price earnings ratio with dividend payout ratio as a moderation and firm characteristic as control variable on the MNC 36 Index Period 2017-2021. Journal of Applied Business and Technology, 4(3), 214-226.

Sari, O. K., Handajani, L., & Pituringsih, E. (2020). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi price earning ratio pada perusahaan manufaktur yang listing di BEI. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(12), 3220.

Seretidou, D., Billios, D., & Stavropoulos, A. (2025). Integrative analysis of traditional and cash flow financial ratios: Insights from a systematic comparative review. Risks, 13(4), 62.

Suhendry, W., Toni, N., & Simorangkir, E. N. (2021). Effect of debt to equity ratio and current ratio on company value with return on assets as intervening variable in consumer goods industrial companies listed on the Indonesia stock exchange for the 2015–2018 Period. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 4(8), 1444-1449.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

29-07-2026

How to Cite

Fitria, A. Y., Rahman, R. S., & Prawiranegara, G. P. (2026). The Impact of Return on Assets and Current Ratio on Shoe Company Valuation From 2018 To 2022. Acman: Accounting and Management Journal, 6(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.55208/aj.v6i1.03